Timothy Scott QC

Year of Call 1975 Silk 1995

Professional Practice

Tim is the preeminent silk specialising in international family law. He is regularly instructed by leading firms (and also many smaller firms) in cases with an international dimension concerning both finance and children. He also has wide experience in drafting international pre- and post-nuptial agreements and advises on the nuptial aspect of trusts.

He has appeared in numerous reported cases, including in both the House of Lords and the Supreme Court. He is accustomed to and enjoys working alongside foreign lawyers and regularly gives expert evidence on English law in other jurisdictions. Tim has particular expertise in the EU Regulations affecting English family law and has played the leading role in drafting the Bar Council’s response to various EU initiatives.

  • Recommendations

    ‘A master of the subject and the go-to silk in cross-border or international work.’
    Legal 500 2016
    His particular strengths are in relation to international law; he has a very compelling manner
    The Legal 500
    Excellent at dealing with difficult clients in a sensitive but firm way
    The Legal 500
    Frequently appears in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, representing clients in respect of complex international financial and private law children proceedings. Expertise: "In terms of the Europe scene and jurisdictonal arguments, there is no better." "He's very confident and he knows the law so well."
    Chambers & Partners 2015
    ‘His accessibility is unrivalled, and he has very sound judgement and excellent drafting skills.'
    Legal 500 2015
    Tim was awarded (2013-14) Legal 500 Children and Family Silk of the Year and was the Chambers & Partners Family Silk of the Year 2011-12. He has been given consistently high rankings in both Chambers & Partners Directory and the Legal 500 for many years. He is ranked in Chambers Band 1 for matrimonial finance and is described as “One of the UK's best matrimonial finance practitioners, particularly in relation to cases with international elements”.
  • Notable Cases

    • EA v AP
      [2013] EWHC 2344 (Fam)
    • Sekhri v Ray
      [2013] EWHC 2290 (Fam)
    • T v T (Anti-arbitration Injunction)
      [2012] EWHC 3462 (HC)
    • K v K (Shared Care Arrangement)
      [2012] 2 FLR 880 (CA)
    • Z v Z (No 2)
      [2012] 1 FLR 1100 (HC)
    • M v V (Child Maintenance: Jurisdiction: Brussels I)
      [2011] 1 FLR 109 (HC)
    • JKN v JCN (Divorce: Forum)
      [2011] 1 FLR 826 (HC)
    • M v M (Financial Provision)
      [2011] 1 FLR 1773 (HC)
    • Agbaje v Agbaje
      [2010] 1 FLR 1813 (SC)
    • Paulin v Paulin
      [2009] 2 FLR 354 (CA)
    • RH v RH (Ancillary Relief: Costs)
      [2008] 2 FLR 2142 (HC)
    • Re G (Abduction: Withdrawal of Proceedings, Acquiescence, and Habitual Residence)
      [2007] EWHC 2807 (Fam)
    • Leman-Klammers v Klammers
      [2007] EWCA Civ 919
    • Akinnoye-Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje
      [2007] EWCA Civ 681
    • Klentzeris v Klentzeris
      [2007] 2 FLR 996 (CA)
    • J v P
      [2007] EWHC 704 (Fam)
    • Ella v Ella
      [2007] 2 FLR 35 (CA)
    • L v L
      [2008] 1 FLR 26 (HC)
    • Prazic v Prazic
      [2006] 2 FLR 1128 (CA)
    • M v M (Stay of Proceedings: Return of Children)
      [2006] 1 FLR 138 (HC)
    • Re L (A Child)
      [2006] 1 FLR 843 (HC)
    • L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: MPS)
      [2006] 2 FLR 1113 (HC)
    • Moses-Taiga v Taiga
      [2006] 1 FLR 1074, CA
    • Rogers- Headicar v Headicar
      [2005] 2 FCR 1 (CA)
    • Re J (Child Returned Abroad: Convention Rights)
      [2005] 2 FLR 802 (HL)
    • Re S (Financial Provision)
      [2005] 2 FLR 94 (CA)
    • Al-Khatib v Masry
      [2005] 1 FLR 381 (CA)
    • Re G (Foreign Contact Order: Enforcement)
      [2004] 1 FLR 378 (CA)
    • Norris v Norris; Haskins v Haskins
      [2003] 2 FLR 1124 (CA)
    • M v M (Prenuptial Agreement)
      [2002] 1 FLR 654 (HC)
    • Ikimi v Ikimi
      [2001] 2 FLR 1288 (CA)
    • Rampal v Rampal (No 2)
      [2001] 2 FLR 1179 (CA)
    • Clark v Clark
      [1999] 2 FLR 498 (CA)
    • Krenge v Krenge
      [1999] 1 FLR 969 (HC)
    • O v Governor of Holloway Prison & Government of USA
      [2000] 1 FLR 147 (QB Divisional Court)
    • U v W (Attorney General Intervening)
      [1997] 2 FLR 282 (HC)
    • Manchanda v Manchanda
      [1995] 2 FLR 590 (CA)
  • Publications and Lecturing

    • Tim is a regular contributor to Family Law, International Family Law and other publications. He is in great demand as a lecturer on a wide range of family law topics. He has spoken at all the major family law conferences as well as at numerous seminars and other lecture venues.
About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our privacy policy page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)